Execution control in the FSB responsible-AI consultation record.
OATHOR Ltd’s response to the Financial Stability Board consultation on Sound Practices for Responsible Adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was published on 6 August 2026 as part of the FSB’s official public consultation record.
Institutional record
The Financial Stability Board’s public-response index identifies OATHOR Ltd among the responses received to its consultation on responsible AI adoption by financial institutions and links directly to OATHOR’s published submission.
OATHOR’s submission contributes an execution-control perspective to the consultation. It identifies execution-boundary risk as a distinct concern, proposes execution proximity as a lens for assessing how close AI systems sit to consequential action, and argues for stronger independent pre-execution control as systems move closer to execution.
Category contribution
The published response applies OATHOR’s public category vocabulary to financial institutions adopting AI. It proposes definitions for execution-boundary risk, execution proximity, and pre-execution control, and identifies Execution Control Infrastructure as OATHOR’s term for the relevant independent control category at the execution boundary.
The submission frames the distinction directly: policy defines obligation, cybersecurity protects access, audit records occurrence, and execution control governs consequence.
Primary sources
The authoritative record remains the Financial Stability Board’s own respondent index and the OATHOR Ltd response hosted by the FSB.